According to Marx, laws have been designed to serve the interests of capitalism and the ruling class of capitalists. They are able to oppress the working class with the help of the laws which exist in the society. Every single law which regulates the relations in the society is created in order to further increase the gap between the ruling class and the working class. Working people get poorer and poorer the more they produce because capitalists take the surplus value which they create.
More Essay Examples on Compare Rubric The analysis of law provided in the works of Marx, Durkheim and Weber is greatly influenced by the theories of the scientists.
According to Marx, laws have been designed to serve the interests of capitalism and the ruling class of capitalists. They are able to oppress the working class with the help of the laws which exist in the society.
The Power Trio of Sociology. Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber are the three most important figures in sociology. Their ideas about society are still discussed today, and you’re apt to hear their names in all branches of sociology. It’s important to know what they thought and said. Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber - Kindle edition by Anthony Giddens. Download it once and read it Reviews: 6. Marx and Weber: Critics of Capitalism. Tweet. Michael Lowy. Winter Their analysis of capitalism cannot be separated from a critical position, explicit in Marx, more ambivalent in Weber. But the content and inspiration of the criticism are very different. Karl Löwith, Max Weber and Karl Marx (London: George Allen & Unwin) , pp.
Every single law which regulates the relations in the society is created in order to further increase the gap between the ruling class and the working class. Working people get poorer and poorer the more they produce because capitalists take the surplus value which they create.
Laws let capitalists obtain the profits which are originated by companies. Even though working people would probably like to change the law and be capable to benefit from the results of their own work, they are not able to do that because they do not have enough power.
As the positivist approach argues, capitalists have their own subjective perceptions of the society and thus the laws are being used in order to put their subjective views on the paper.
Capitalists have their views on the ways in which they would like to see the world they live in. They do their best to ensure that the laws are adopted to regulate the society according to the most favorable pattern for them.
According to it, law also serves the interests of capitalists but it appears as the result of the objective process. Capitalists dominate in the society and therefore the trends in legislation which serve their interests are fully objective.
It is understandable that legislation needs to reflect the interests of the ruling class, and therefore this process is fully objective. Max Weber has very different views on law, in comparison with Marx. According to Weber, law does not reflect subjective interests of the capitalist class or objective characteristics of capitalist society.
There is no class which determines the features of the legislation.
All of the people in the society are parts of the same machine which functions only when all of the parts are in order. As Weber states, modern society is what actually determines the law ruling in the society.
In the modern society, bureaucracy determines all of the elements of regulation. Modern organizations are all characterized by bureaucracy. It is present on all levels of the organizations.
In bureaucratic organizations decisions are made by the management and forwarded to the employees on lower level. All of the people working for such organizations are similar to parts of a peculiar machine.
They need to fulfill certain functions and certain responsibilities, without which the whole machine will fall apart. Employees are generally unable to make decisions on their own because they mostly have to follow the instructions of management.
Creativity is not encouraged and empowerment of employees is prohibited.
All of the bureaucratic organizations function according to a peculiar system of law which is common for all of the organizations of a kind. All of the decisions made in companies are fully rational. There is no place for subjective opinions in them because rationality rules the society.
There is also no place for personalization in such a society. Every person is just a part of the machine. He is not an individual; he is only a part of the large society.
All of the people are thus considered to be similar to one another and thus capable to function according to the same rules.Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber all offer a wide array of thoughts and ideas regarding to religion.
Firstly, Emile Durkheim's views of religion will be explained. Firstly, Emile Durkheim's views of religion will be explained. Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber all offer a wide array of thoughts and ideas regarding to religion.
Firstly, Emile Durkheim's views of religion will be explained. Firstly, Emile Durkheim's views of religion will be explained. Interestingly, both Marx and Weber, albeit for different reasons, end up looking towards societies that either transcend or downplay religion.
===== Catherine Bell ===== Both Marx and Weber take up the notion of socioeconomic class as one component of their analysis of what they considered the keystone to modern culture and society, modern . Comparing the Ideologies of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber were three historical sociologists.
Their views have become world renown and have shaped many ways of interpreting the social structure of many modern societies. Comparison of Marx, Durkheim and Weber Words | 7 Pages. Response Paper #1 Marx, Weber, Durkheim, introducing the godfathers of sociology.
Three of the most influential theorists that are debated on and about till our present time.
Karl Marx ( - ) and Max Weber ( - ) have often been regarded as the founding fathers of interpretive sociology, or of the social action approach within sociology.
Marx and Weber’s characteristics of modern societies were different. Marx stressed capitalism and class conflict and Weber stressed rationalisation and bureaucracy. .