As the nurse administrator, you determine an audit of elder-patient readmissions would be helpful data to be collected.
Ann Saudi Med 31 4 July-August www. We did a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the impact of accreditation programs on the quality of healthcare services.
Several databases were systematically searched, including Medline, Embase, Healthstar, and Cinhal. Twenty-six studies evaluating the impact of accreditation were identified. The majority of the studies showed general accreditation for acute myocardial infarction AMItrauma, ambulatory surgical care, infection control and pain management; and subspecialty accreditation programs to significantly improve the process of care provided by healthcare services by improving the structure and organization of healthcare facilities.
Several studies showed that general accreditation programs significantly improve clinical outcomes and the quality of care of these clinical conditions and showed a significant positive impact of subspecialty accreditation programs in improving clinical outcomes in different subspecialties, including sleep medicine, chest pain management and trauma management.
There is consistent evidence that shows that accreditation programs improve the process of care provided by healthcare services. There is considerable evidence to show that accreditation programs im- prove clinical outcomes of a wide spectrum of clinical conditions.
Accreditation programs should be supported as a tool to improve the quality of healthcare services. Accreditation programs spread all over the world in the s. Licensure involves a process by which governmental authority grants per- mission, usually following inspection against minimal standards, to an individual practitioner or healthcare organization to operate in an occupation or profes- sion.
Another recently published review of the literature related to accreditation had several limita- tions. In our review, we limited our search to health services accreditation. Second, the period covered in the search in the other review was only up to May and several important publications have been published since May A comprehensive updated search of several electronic bibliographic databases was performed, including Medline, from to June ; Cinhal, from to June ; Embase, from to June ; and HealthStar, from to June No language restrictions were used.
The Joint Commission has a list of national patient safety goals were set in place to guide improvements in safety of patients and to help highlight any problem areas within the healthcare systems regarding patient’s safety (The Joint Commission, ). Aug 05, · If your hospital is looking for ways to address unique patient needs and comply with new standards for patient-centered communication, you’ll want to review the The Joint Commission’s free monograph, Advancing Effective Communication, Cultural Competence, and Patient- and Family-Centered Care: A Roadmap for Hospitals. Commission’s new standards and national patient safety goals for , and challenges from with strategies for on compliance data on challenging accreditation standards in Connecticut hospitals. Joint Commission Standards and National Patient Safety Goals Update Registration and Breakfast: a.m. - a.m.
Experts in the area of accreditation were contacted to identify relevant studies. An analysis of abstracts of the citations was conducted to iden- tify substantial studies relevant to health services ac- creditation by AK.
Twenty studies were excluded that described the attitude of health- care professionals towards accreditation. Five studies were excluded that described the cost of accredita- tion of healthcare services. Te n studies evaluated the impact of a general accreditation program on the overall performance of hospitals.
Nine studies evaluated the impact of a general accreditation program on a single aspect of hospital performance. Seven studies evaluated the impact of subspecialty ac- creditation programs.
The impact of general accreditation programs on the overall performance of hospitals In the South African randomized controlled trial, 20 randomly selected public hospitals, stratified by size, were selected.
Ten of these hospitals were random- ized to the accreditation program in ; the other 10 served as controls.
About 2 years after accreditation began; intervention hospi- tals significantly improved their average compliance with COHSASA accreditation standards, while no appreciable increase was observed in the control hospitals. However, with the exception of nurse perceptions of clinical quality, the independent re- search team observed little or no effect of accredita- Table 1.
Study quality grading approach. Study quality Description Comparable groups are assembled initially and maintained throughout the study; reliable and valid measurement instruments are used and applied equally to the groups; important outcomes are considered; and appropriate attention is given to confounders in analysis.
Fair Comparable groups are assembled initially, but some questions remain, viz. Poor Groups assembled initially are not close to being comparable or maintained throughout the study; unreliable or invalid measurement instruments are used or not applied at all equally among groups; and key confounders are given little or no attention.a private nongovernmental agency that establishes guidelines for the operation of hospitals and other health care facilities, conducts accreditation programs and surveys, and encourages the attainment of high standards of institutional medical care in the United States.
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety by Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations () in English and No Linguistic content and held by WorldCat member libraries worldwide.
Patient satisfaction with pain control is a valid measure of a hospital’s efforts to assess pain management and implementation of Joint Commission standards, insofar as it reflects the subjective nature of the pain experience.
Suicide risk assessment continues to be a high focus area for The Joint Commission. Accordingly, TJC will further strengthen its approach to suicide risk reduction in and revise National Patient Safety Goal NPSG Joint Commission Annual Report. Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) best-value healthcare Supports and ensures patient’s safety through standards & elements of performance (EPs).
Environment of Care (EC) Documents Similar To joint commision regulations. Functioning of . The Joint Commission evaluates and accredits more than 16, health care organizations in the United States, including 4, hospitals, more than 3, home care entities, and over 7, other health care organizations that provide behavioral health care, laboratory, ambulatory care, .